zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

Alien Vs Predator (2004)

Alien Vs Predator
In an bizarre twist during the filming of Alien Vs Predator, the production crew unearths 16 missing years of Anthony Michael Hall's career.

Starring:

Lance Henrickson
Sanna Lathan
Raoul Bova

Released By:

20th Century Fox

Released In:

2004

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

C


Alien Vs. Predator has been kicking around Hollywood for many years. Looming out there like a fantasy, like a movie-geek's wet dream. Now, after going through various directors and several different re-writes, the film finally arrives with a (PG-13) rating (WHAT?), an all-too-brief 90 minute running time (ARE YOU KIDDING ME?), and often ridiculed director Paul Anderson at the helm (NOOOOOOO!).

As if the much vaunted galactic grudge-match didn't already have enough strikes against it, it's been the target of tons of negative buzz in the past few months. The film has lurched about beneath a big black cloud since it started production and with good reason. In the eyes of many a movie fan (myself included), Mr. Anderson doesn't have the best track record. (This is the Paul Anderson who's given us Mortal Kombat, Event Horizon, and Resident Evil, not the Paul T. Anderson who gave us Boogie Nights and Punchdrunk Love).

Alien and Predator are beloved properties, and most certainly, many of us had hoped that either James Cameron, Ridley Scott, or even John McTiernan would have stepped up to the Captain's console. Still, no matter who the director, I'm always willing to give a flick a fair chance (I've even watched all of Joel Schumacher's films - and
actually liked a couple of them).

AVP (as the ad campaign calls it - it's logo resembling a porno outfit - Adult Video Productions or something) pits the almighty Predators against the sleek and fierce Aliens. The gist of the plot (which takes place in 2004) revolves around a group of diverse specialists called upon by entrepreneur Charles Bishop Weyland (Lance Henriksen), when he discovers an ancient pyramid buried two thousand feet beneath the ice in Antartica (It's a wonder they didn't throw The Thing and The Blob into the mix).

Lead by a mountain climbing expert (Sanaa Lathan), the assembled team of experts embark on a harrowing expedition only to find that they've been lead into a trap set by a race of Predators who hope to re-engage in a war with their old foe, the Aliens, who just so happen to reside in the pyramid. For a (PG-13) affair, this movie has a hefty body count and there are certainly unexpected deaths in this picture. Too bad we don't really get to know any of these people.

First of all, AVP has one of the worst screenplays in recent memory. I suppose it could be argued that a film like this is all about the action, but the human characters must still engage in conversation and the dialogue here is beyond laughable (i.e. "My enemy's enemy is my friend."). These so called specialists converse in stilted platitudes that smack of leftover cardboard cut-out characters from Roland Emmerich's recent Day After Tomorrow. Most of the human cast run around
frantically overstating the obvious, and what's worse, the film is so damn short that we don't even get a chance to figure out exactly who they are, much less why we don't care about them. The proceedings are underdeveloped beyond belief.

The story itself was developed by Anderson, original Alien scribe Dan
O'Bannon, Ronald Shusett, Jim Thomas, and John Thomas, but Anderson gets a lone screenwriting credit for AVP. I wouldn't be surprised if the other writers decided to remain unidentified. While there are certainly interesting revelations made about the history of the Alien and Predator races, the movie doesn't always make sense, especially given the time lines presented in both franchises.

For example, I was completely dumbfounded by the inclusion of Charles Bishop Weyland (the character who would invent android Bishop in his own image) in this picture, because he makes an appearance in Alien 3 which takes place 100's of years later. Perhaps we are to assume that Weyland was cryogenically preserved, or perhaps he was cloned many years later. Maybe the Weyland in Alien 3 was just another android. Who the hell knows. AVP is riddled with plot holes and a severe lack of logistical cohesion.

Paul Anderson the director actually gets things right - to a certain extent. AVP has an outstanding visual style and it moves at a bullet's pace once our specialists reach the pyramid. The Alien/Predator battles are thrilling, bringing to mind the cyborg duels in The Terminator films. I've heard complaints about the Matrix style face-huggers that jump through the air in slow motion, but I wasn't at all bothered by them.

While watching the action of AVP unfold it did occur to me that Anderson is in fact a fan of both franchises. He even pays homage to various techniques that Cameron and Scott used in their films. I also loved the art direction and editing in this picture, although it
certainly lends itself more to the Alien films than the Predator movies. The technical execution is near perfect, and I was truly surprised by the effects work. Many of the Aliens are CGI but they are seamlessly intergrated amongst the live performers. Even the Alien Queen (which is virtually identical to the one in Cameron1s picture) is a marvel to behold, although I'm not quite sure how she and her egg sack were preserved underneath that ice for so long.

I'm not going to spend a bunch of time discussing performances, because none of these actors bring much to the table, but how could they. The
characterzations (or lack thereof) are positively awful. Anderson is easily one of the most disliked genre directors working today. It's disheartening really, because he certainly isn't without talent. For whatever reason, he continues to make below-average movies, and AVP doesn't exactly buck this trend. Anderson has assured Alien and Predator worshipers everywhere that he too is a fan, and this certainly shows in the action sequences, but sadly there is zero chemistry between the human players.

The film also takes a sour detour in the final act, and as a result, it almost becomes comical. The Predator's unlikely alliance is punctuated by a bizarre flirtation that almost seems sexual in nature. And, of course, Anderson can't resist opening the door for a follow-up by offering a finale that, while expected, had the audience howling with laughter. It is meant to be taken seriously, but is so goofy in appearance that it reminded me of a similar moment in Bride of Chucky (which was clearly played for laughs).

So in the end, there are a few ways to rate this movie;
As an Alien or Predator flick, I enjoyed it more than Alien: Resurection and Predator 2, but it's a far cry from Ridley Scott and James Cameron's contributions to their respective franchises, and it can't match the gothic grandeur of David Fincher's underrated Alien 3. And as solid as the action content is, it lacks the in-your-face explosiveness of John McTiernan's first Predator picture.

As a franchise merger, I suppose the movie delivers the goods. The
Alien/Predator battles are exciting (save for a CGI overkill flashback
sequence) and the way the film makers bring the two species together is
interesting, if a tad silly. Where this fairly new trend of putting
franchises together is concerned, I was more entertained by this than I was Freddy Vs. Jason, but it's not really a fair comparison, because the Alien and Predator movies are held to a higher standard than the Friday and Nightmare films.

And finally, as yet another landmark on Anderson's already legendary resume, I'd honestly have to say that AVP is his most entertaining film. Resident Evil was trash and an absolute abomination of everything I hold dear in the zombie universe (a genre I hope will be revitalized with the arrival of the brilliant Shaun of the Dead). Mortal Kombat was just further proof that movies based on video games are crap. Event Horizon is a tough one. While it had an interesting premise, Anderson didn't do anything interesting with it. It was like Hellraiser in space, only dull and devoid of decent scares.

I guess I can't look anyone straight in the face and tell them AVP is a
great film, but I can look you straight in the face and tell you it isn't complete garbage. Perhaps that's because I went in with the lowest of expectations. As dumb, silly and illogical as much of AVP is, it offers up some pretty damn entertaining action. This movie may not be what fans were hoping for, but it certainly could have been much worse.

On a side note, the (PG-13) rating does not prove to be a major factor. The movie is surprisingly violent. No, we don't get any graphic shots of aliens bursting from chests but there's plenty of carnage on display.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Postponed Gratification

Postponed Gratification

It's never a good sign when a studio cancels the premiere of a film they've spent buckets of money promoting, but it happened this week. The film? Aliens Versus Predator. So if you were looking forward to footage of an Alien working its way down the red carpet, you're out of luck. Now, there are only two reasons why something like this would happen.

Reason one, and this is the most common one: the film sucks so bad that the studio doesn't want anybody to see it in advance so that negative word of mouth won't have a chance to spoil the opening weekend business.

Reason two, and this is the excuse the studio is actually using: things are so incredibly disorganized that the director has missed his deadline and prints aren't physically ready yet. That much disorder cannot possibly bode well for a film, and word is that not only are the final prints not ready but the final edit hasn't even been completed, which raises the very real possibility that prints will not be ready on time for the film's advertised release date.

Adam

Adam

Postponed Gratification,

Hi there. I just saw the picture and in fact would have had the review up late Thursday night had my internet service not gone out. Per your comment, I'm going with number one. Fox is extremely nervous about this movie. There's no way they didn't have final edit locked. That's bull. Funny enough, the movie isn't horrible. It certainly doesn't rank up there with the first three Alien pictures or the first Predator, but I enjoyed it more than Alien: Resurection and Predator 2.

David Sollami

David Sollami

Ok first of all, to make alien vs predator a film is hard enough, second to be able to please all the wannabe's of the film industry who claim to have some understanding of truth behind the films franchise is hard enough, but this is one thing all fans must know if they pick up a copy of the comic books and actually read them, Paul Anderson did a kick ass job in bringing this massive world of aliens, predators and humans together, the fights were amazing in the film and the actors did a decent job, geez cut the guy some slack, I hate reading all these terrible reviews, and then talking with many friends of all ages and different tastes and having them report to me of the success of the film, the action thriller brings it and a bag of kick ass to the big screen, this movie rocks and I give it a 9 out of 10 if there was a stronger plot and a tid bit longer i'd definitley would have given it a 10, please for all your foolish people who dont like Paul Anderson, LAY OFF! you couldnt do half the job he has put forth, GO see it, IT KICKS BUTT,

Sincerely, David Sollami a 22 year old alien vs predator fan, kick ass, love god and live life,

PEACE OUT

THarritt

THarritt

Ok, that might have been an overreaction. As a hardcore fan of both alien and predator, I am not just dissapointed in the moive, but PISSED OFF as well. The movie broke my heart. I went in with low expectations; but I was looking, no, praying for any excuse to say the movie was good.

I found none.

You cite the action as being decent. Simply put, no its not. Of course, its all a matter of opinion, so let me explain mine. Basically, the action scenes, at the core, were not too bad. Nothing exceptional; but still something I would have been happy with. However, many of the combat scenes were horribly marred by poor cinematagrophy. The combat scene between the alien and the predator; where the aliens head is branded by the predator's net, is an example of Anderson's terrible take on how the scene should have been shot. It makes it nearly impossible to figure out what was going on. Not to mention this and the slow-mo effect were grossly overused (maybe he was a Matrix:Reloaded junky). Whatever the case, the end result was the butchering of what may have been the movie's only strong point.

As for Paul Anderson, he's an idiot. You may think he has talent, but every movie he has directed is terrible. It's true that for Mortal Combat, Resident Evil, and AvP all the screenplays were horrible. But what about Event Horizon. You said it yourself, the premise was interesting, but Anderson didn't come through. I'm seeing a trend here.

As far as the rest of the movie is concerned...

(for the sake of the faint hearted, all profainities have been replaced with the word squelch.)

SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH SQUELCH !!!!1!!!1!

See how angry this movie makes me? Look at those 1s amidst all the !!!! Only a really angry person or a Counter-Strike playing 12 year old is capable of such horrid type.

Whatever, basically...

Grade:C?

WHAT THE F*&K IS THE MATTER WITH YOU! PULL YOUR HEAD OUT!

Grade: F--------... 'eff that how about Z----, yea Z works for me.

Good Hellsing

Good Hellsing

Continuing to take cues from comic books, Hollywood has hit upon a sure-fire formula for milking a few more bucks out of fading franchises: Pit them against each other in a battle to the finish. The success of last year's Freddy vs. Jason made Alien vs. Predator a sure bet, and if this one is a hit we can no doubt look forward to next summer's blockbuster Van Helsing vs. Catwoman.

C was very kind

C was very kind

The plot of this misbegoten clunker might sound complicated, but it really just boils down to a bunch of people running around a dimly lit set and getting slimed and skewered until almost nobody's left. All of the would-be jolts are predictable, and most of the characters are gone before they even get a chance to become one-dimensional. The grand finale, in which a surviving human bonds with one of the title creatures, had a preview audience hooting with derisive laughter. Who wins? Who cares.

Stephen Barber

Stephen Barber

Any time a film that's supposed to be scary has far more unintentional laughs than scares, you know you're in for a long night even if it is only 90 minutes in running time.

Yawwwwwn!

Yawwwwwn!

As Adam Mentioned we critics were not allowed an advance screening of the film. So much like many critics I'm sure I had to sit through a Midnighter on thursday night and it right away became obvious who the big winner is in Alien Vs. Predator? Everyone who avoids going to see the film. Not only do you save $9.50, you avoid a night of disappointment.

Greg Ridell

Greg Ridell

Like Mr. Mast AVP was better than I thought it would be. Writer and director Paul W.S. Anderson trades in the typical nu-metal music that nearly strangled his earlier work for a symphonic soundtrack. Anderson also leaves most of his MTV camera tricks at home. I'd have to disagree with Adam however about the retarded scene where a facehugger flies at a guy and, mid-flight, floats in slow-motion - that was too gay.

I also think the gorehounds are going to be disappointed by the lack of stomach-turning butchery. In Alien vs. Predator, a Predator slashes his metallic claw thingie at one guy and you see a splatter of blood hit, a few feet away. The chestburster scene looks like a stop-motion display of a woman getting breast implants. Some chick shoots a gun at a man but the camera cuts before we get a chance to see anything. A corporate director, chickenshit studio and overused editing machine don't do justice to a couple races of monsters who exist primarily for carnage

Carnage aside, Paul Anderson does just what he did with Resident Evil. He claims to be the "biggest fan in the world" of the series, promises to be faithful to its origins and then completely throws out everything that made the earlier installments memorable. Sorry Adam. In Anderson's crazy new Alien and Predator world, the Predators are the good guys, never after humans -- unless they're carrying baby aliens -- and were worshipped as gods by humans. Being that he claims to be the biggest fan of the Predator series alive, I'm surprised that Anderson forgot that Predators hunted humans in the first two films, skinned them alive, hung them upside down and kept their skulls as trophies. I would give the film a C as well, but for different reasons than your Mr. Mast. Whom I respect, by the way and have met a few times.

Alien Mother

Alien Mother

I do agree with Adam's assessment of The Queen Alien. This mutha outdoes the scary bitch we were given by James Cameron in Aliens. Not because Anderson is a better director than James (that'd be like saying Ed Wood is superior to Alfred Hitchcock), but because technology has improved in the past 18 years. The Queen is a slobbering, pissed-off beeotch and it's worth the price of admission, just to see her in action.

Imagine the T-Rex in Jurassic Park. Now imagine the T-Rex in Jurassic Park as an Alien. Now imagine the T-Rex in Jurassic Park as an Alien directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, rather than Steven Spielberg. The beast would still look cool, but it wouldn't scare you alot more.

Adam

Adam

Hi Everyone. I knew I'd be attacked for going so far as to give this movie a C. I'm sure those of you who loathe this picture (and there are plenty of you) probably think I must be out of my mind. The truth is, I'm a huge fan of the Alien films (most notably the first three) and the first Predator. In fact, Aliens was one of my top five favorite pictures when it was released in 1986. I'm not going to sit here and tell anyone that AVP is a classic. It certainly isn't. But I definitely take offense to THarritt suggesting I take my head out! AVP isn't garbage. Johnson Family Vacation, Sleepover, and The Whole Ten Yards are garbage. Those movies are positively unbearable to sit through (as was last year's House of the Dead). At the very least, AVP has a few nice action sequences and a pretty darn cool visual sense. That alone makes it tolerable. I'm sorry you hated the film this much Tharritt, but there are worse movies this year, and I'm sure there will be others before 2004 is over. AVP is mediocre, but go check out the previously mentioned movies and tell me which is worse. AVP had a lot to live up to, and while it certainly emerges as a sub par franchise merger, it could have been much much worse. And as I stated in my review, I found this movie more entertaining than the last Alien film and Predator 2. I too wanted this movie to be great, but I'll take below average over worthless.

Ariel AleX Co.

Ariel AleX Co.

Damn.... Im getting kinda "frustated" about this movie. I've been waiting for this movie's realese since December or something, since I got knowledge that the movie was going to be made [and almost about 7 years waiting for the comic-concept to go into movies]

But I found out at 1:08 am on the very same friday 13th (getting almost ready to go buying the tickets first thing in the mornning) that the movie was going to be realeses until the next moth [spt16] in my country [Méx.].... crap! and I really wanted to see this movie in theathers, but so it seems that Ill have to go next monday or friday (depends on how fast "they" are) to buy a pirate copy of the movie. Damn! ¬_¬

Never the less, reading your reviews, I've been getting this feeling of dont even knowing if to buy the pirate copy of the movie. its scarryng me to know that I Might have wasted a lot of time waiting for a movie that ended up been a crapy-thing.

Another thing... you spend $9.50 in a theather movie?? holly s#!t! and it thought that paying $2.50 [wedns] or $4.80 was very expensive. :S

Ariel AleX Co.

John Pearl

John Pearl

I am going to assume that you were too busy writing thoughts down to pay attention to some of the smaller details that were given in the film or perhaps you just don't think past what a director states clearly via dialog because -

As you so incorrectly put it, the humans were not "...lead into a trap set by a race of Predators who hope to reengage in a war with their old foe, the Aliens, who just so happen to reside in the pyramid." Yes, the humans were lead into a trap but no, the Predators are not just mindlessly opening up another stint of war nor do the Aliens live in the pyramid.

Apparently, every hundred years "young" Predators are given a chance to be recognized as warriors by being tested in the ultimate hunt. Much like an Indian youth would go hunting to come home a man. To participate in the hunt was a privilege for the Predator. However, if all the Aliens were killed in the hunt they would have to "re-grow" another colony of the Alien to fight in the hunt.

Enter the Queen. As far as I understood only the Queen was present in the pyramid from the start of the movie and even then she was incapacitated... frozen. You can't miss the chains and restraints all over her which were obviously placed there by something else (hmm, Predator). Once the humans were led into place the Queen was raised (remember the sequence with the shocks of electricity) and naturally began to produce eggs which were then used to infect the humans.

The dialog was weak in places but you don't represent it right. For example, you dumbed down the quote: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" by stating it as "My enemy's enemy is my friend." While subtle, the former is correct and seems to remind me of an ancient proverb which is suitable as the quote comes initially from the Italian culture what's-his-face.

I agree the the character development sucked. I agree that the ending was a weak but I didn't find the exchange between Human and Predator to be sexual nor comical. I did, however, think that it was a little cornballed and anti-climatic. I also thought that the Human/Predator alliance was a little out of place since the Predator is "becoming a man" and not particularly interested in initiating a new member to the species.

Charles Weyland inclusion stumped me as well but certainly doesn't destroy the continuity of the films as it is never indicated that the Bishop in A3 is the actual Weyland. I for one assumed it was another copy of the same android in Aliens and A3's crash site/scrap scene.

I don't think that the way the species are brought together is all that far-fetched keeping in mind that it is the Predator's orchestrating the whole thing and they seem to have control throughout the plot as well.

All in all, I agree with most of the points you make but needed to clarify some of the things you said where I felt differently.

Adam

Adam

John Pearl,

My bad. You are correct in your overall synopsis of the AVP plot. The truth is I wasn't writing things down during the film. Perhaps I should have been. I got the gist of the plot, and I probably should have written such. In the end, the screenplay is so weak, that I forgot some of the key elements by the time the movie was over. While I really have no excuse (especially given that I've been doing this for a long time), it really doesn't matter. AVP is not the type of picture that will stir up much debate over it's plot. Still, thanks for pointing out my mistake. As for Weyland, I do recall him making a speech in Alien 3 where he proclaims that he isn't Bishop, but that he designed him. That's what lead to my confusion about the character in this film. As a matter of fact, I just popped Alien 3 (I still say it's underrated) in the DVD player so that I could check the whole thing out. After I do, I'll post whatever conclusion I come to on this board. Thanks for hitting our site.

Seth

Seth

I actually thought that AVP was an outstanding movie! Well, for me at least. But in order for alot of this to make sense, you would have to watch the original Predators(1 & 2 and Alien(1-4). Personally I thought it could have been longer but it still was still awesome. Much of it showed alot of stuff about what the two foes did in the originals, like for example, Charles Bishop Weyland is a very wealthy man and he is the future Bishop in Aliens. Like, when I was at the movies sunday night I heard alot of people talking about the facehuggers, but they were calling them "spider things". I dont know, but in order for this movie to make alot more sense, I advise you watch the other six films first, that way this movie can shine like it did to me. Overall, I'd say this movie is an A-.

Darren

Darren

Well, to say the least.. I was very disappointed. I've been an Aliens and Predator fan ever since I was around 4 years of age, and after watching AvP, I felt sick. I didn't mind the acting so much as the lack of research that obviously went into the characters, creatures, and overall -continuity- of Aliens and Predators. The aliens were far too powerful.. I mean.. a single drone alien taking out two blooded Preds doesn't quite fit.. at all. If Ripley can smoke a Queen, and an entire COLONY of xenomorphs, then I'd expect three Predators to handle about fifteen or so of them.. Several other things didn't quite add up, but.. true fans can notice little things like that. In any case.. all-in-all, the movie sucked.. horribly.

John Pearl

John Pearl

Adam, no problems... I too thought the screenplay was shoddy but I did need to point out some of the points you called wrong. I watched A3 today (it is terribly under rated) and agree that it comes off as the designer of Bishop, not a copy. I would call it safe to say this is an error in the writing.

Billy Bringhurst

Billy Bringhurst

I'm 14 years old and I've never seen anything other than one of the Alien movies - I'm not even sure which one and i thought this movie was great - the rest of you just sound like a bunch of dorks arguing about the backstory - it's a movie about monsters fighting each other. Lighten up

Too young to understand!

Too young to understand!

Billy. I think it's safe to say that those of us who are older and grew up loving the Alien and Predator films feel let down. That's not something you can all together understand, because as you stated in your message, you've only seen one of the other Alien movies. We respect your opininon. Everyone has different likes and dislikes. However, it's not fair for you to tell us to lighten up, because this movie means more to us. The first two Alien movies are milestones and the first Predator is a near perfect action movie. AVP could have been much more than what it is. The backstory wasn't too bad, but none of these characters were remotely believable nor did they have anything interesting to say. Movies of this nature are more effective when the audience cares (or at the very least, knows) about the human that's about to get torn apart. My advice to you young man, is to wisen up. We're not dorks. We're just passionate about movies.

Rizzo

Rizzo

The costumes of the "Predators" were atrocious and vaguely resembled the originals in "Predator" and "Predator 2." One of the main reasons that Jean-Claude Van Damme originally backed out of playing the original part of Predator was because the costume did NOT look at all like the original drawings. I was at lunch with Jean last week and he told me that AVP was going to be a flop because of the poor casting!! The aliens were not that believable and should have been muscular on their exoskeleton. Spielberg has set the bar as far as aliens are concerned and I would have liked to have seen a more believable and friendly alien.

I'm in the biz in L.A., so I do know my stuff.

Ratso

Ratso

That's funny. I've worked as a stand-in for Jean for years, and we're in Holland shooting a film called "Phill, Mike, Hunt", so he couldn't have possibly had lunch with you last week. But I do agree with you on the AVP casting and costume design. An absolute travesty. My name is Ratso, and I really am in the biz!

Brandy

Brandy

Ratzo, if you're really in the business then you'll know me. In fact I've done several films with Mike Hunt and what can I say, it's not Shakespeare, but it pays the rent.

Hans Gruber

Hans Gruber

I went in to Alien vs Predator with very low expectations, especially knowing that Paul Anderson was going to direct it. (He totally botched Resident Evil, one of my favorite video games.) However, AvP was more enjoyable than i thought it would be. It had many problems but it was enjoyable to watch the monsters duke it out.

To start off, no one going to this movie is looking for an Oscar winning plot. They are going for the action, which was very well done. The CGI and costumed characters were put together very well and look great. I did have several thoughts though. Firstly, Anderson, I noticed, has a tendincy to kill off large groups of people at a time. I think this takes away from the suspence and deprives the viewer of better Alien and Preditor death scenes. Secondly, Anderson kills off two of the three Predators at the beginning of the film, taking away more oportunities for action. Lastly, even though I did like the fact that the Predators had to get their blasters out of the pyrimid before use, i thought there was not enough blaster action in the movie. As a Predator fan, I was expecting more of that. Aside from those comments on the action, I thought it was well put together, stays faithful to the original films, and is very enjoyable for a sci-fi action buff. The action is what made the film enjoyable, a better developed plotline would have made it a good movie.

The premise for this film was actually pretty good It allowed for an entertaining film. However, there were many plot holes. The film is about a group of scientists exploring an underground pyramid in Antarctica discoverd billionaire Charles Bishop Wayland and his company. Once they they reach the pyramid, this doomed group of people discover that they have been lured there by the Predators to be hosts for the Aliens that they need to hunt as their "coming of age" test. The scientists find themselves fighting for their lives in the middle of a war that could easily doom the planet. Entangled in this is the history of ancient humans as well as other plot additions that complicate Anderson's movie. It could have been a easy, simple, extremely enjoyible, sci-fi flick, but pointless confusions were added that brought the movie down to a less then perfect level.

My biggest problem with was the character of Charles Bishop Wayland (Lance Henrikson).The movie offers no explanation as to how he is related to the character in Aliens and Alien3, which take place a significant amount of time later. I thought Henrikson was the right actor for the part but the plotline just did not show the relationship. This could have been fixed by placing the movie in the future and not killing him off or simply by giving the character a different name. Another problem was that all the characters were knocked off so fast that there was no time for character developement. I wanted to see more of the people before the met their untimely demise. Lastly, was the foolish alliance between the The character of Lex and the Preditor. It was silly and a waste of time. There are other little things that you can pick at with this movie but no one has time to read them all so I will end with that and conclude that Anderson should leave the scriptwriting to the professionals.

I did enjoy the film even though it is light years away from Oscar winning and i think hardcore fans of the Alien and Predator franchises will be entertained. It was far more enjoyable then Alien Ressurection and Predator 2 and it is deffinitely something to watch on a dark stormy night (Maybe with a girl friend) on the weekend.

P.S: Paul W.S. Anderson still has a long way to go to redeem himself from the shitty movies he's made.

sirdizzy

sirdizzy

I thought for sure I wasn't going to like this movie, as the two stories don't really work that well together, but I was wrong. The movie was surprisingly good all the while not being that special. I mean the movie is just sheer "popcorn" fun, while playing out the what if story if these two iconic creatures were to meet up and do battle. The movie is sadly missing the suspense of the first two aliens movies as well as the first predator movie, which is half the reason they were so great. Heck, in the first Aliens movie we don't actually see the Alien until almost the very end of the movie. Much like last years Freddy Vs Jason the movies are more about having fun and pitting two great cinematic characters together with enhanced CGI and some great fight scenes. But the part I liked the most was the interaction of the Predators and the humans, as the Predators are the lesser of the evils and the humans find themselves having to rely on them to stay alive "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Like I said there is nothing really that special about this movie, sure it has some great fight scenes and some nice looking CGI but the originals of both series' are much better than this movie could have ever hoped to be. But for fans of these classic alien characters this movie will not disappoint them, as overall the movie is worth a viewing even if its just a matinee.

wild brown

wild brown

i can't wait to see this movie. but i don't want it to be a scary one, because i got scared when i watched the movie signs. i mean i literally shat my pants it was that freaky.

Cody Quinn

Cody Quinn

I honestly think that AVP was like watching it on T.V! When ever someone was about to die it went to the next scene! Hardly any blood but yes some good action. Alien movies are supposed to be full of blood and gorey chest bursting scenes but nothing. It did leen to more of a Alien story line but I would have preferred more of the Preadators side. Grade c-

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!