zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

Melinda and Melinda (2005)

Melinda and Melinda
"I'm afraid Woody doesn't think I'm being funny? Maybe I should take off all my clothes and run down the middle of the street?"

Starring:

Radha Mitchell
Will Ferrell
Chloe Sevigny
Chiwetel Ejiofor

Released By:

Fox Searchlight

Released In:

2005

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

B-


Melinda and Melinda is the latest effort from Mr. Neurotic himself, Woody Allen. Sadly, the Woodman isn't quite the force he used to be. This isn't to say that his recent efforts have been awful. I maintain that a mediocre film from Allen is still better than, say - a strong effort from Michael Bay.

Melinda and Melinda gets a major boost from a lively and creative narrative. The film opens with a dinner gathering in which two playwrights argue (playfully) over which is a more relevant genre - comedy or tragedy? Another dinner guest pitches a scenario, and the two intellectual writers chime in with their interpretations of the same story - one funny and one sad. Rather than telling both stories from beginning to end, Allen opts to inter-cut the two - making for a most interesting flow. Both tales feature a terrific turn by a very capable Radha Mitchell - who plays Melinda, a troubled young woman whose sudden and unannounced appearance at a dinner party sets into motion a chain reaction of romantic events that involve a handful of people from her past.

Melinda and Melinda is a story about relationships and dysfunction, two things the gifted Allen has made a science of. Not surprisingly, we are expected to feel sympathy toward characters who cheat on their loved ones. While I didn't always feel sympathetic, at the very least, the justifications for some of these characters' actions are handled in a very adult manner, and it helps that the people in Allen's universe are three dimensional.

Mitchell is quickly making a name for herself in the business with solid work in movies like Finding Neverland. Melinda and Melinda is certainly a breakthrough of sorts in that she really carries the film. The differences between sad Melinda and lighthearted Melinda are subtle, but then that's the beauty of her nuanced work in this picture. She's never over the top. The supporting players are terrific, most notably Chloe Sevigny as a passionate woman coming to terms with a failed relationship, and a charming Chiwetel Ejiofor (so good in the little seen Dirty Pretty Things) as an understanding man who finds himself caught up in an unexpected love triangle. Will Ferrell offers some laughs as a goofy, out of work actor who can't help but develop a crush on Melinda.

I wouldn't rank this among Allen's best efforts. The dialogue and characterizations aren't nearly as interesting as the plot structure. And let's face it, if Allen had made Melinda and Melinda as two different films - one funny and one sad - they most likely would be proclaimed labored, underdeveloped and somewhat pretentious. Thankfully, he had the good sense to lend a creative narrative to the proceedings making the familiar more tolerable than it might have been otherwise.

Simply put, this is a movie with great moments, but it isn't necessarily a great movie. It never entirely came together for me, and I had reservations with the way some of the female characters in this picture were portrayed. No doubt, Allen was drawing inspiration from some of the women in his own life, but in the end, Melinda and Melinda lacks the consistent humor and insight of Annie Hall, the personal traits of the intimate Deconstructing Harry and the sheer dramatic power of, what I believe to be Woody Allen's very best film, Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Again, Melinda and Melinda does have strong moments and a terrific lead in the form of Radha Mitchell, but this film wasn't quite as involving as I'd hoped it would be. As for which is more important - comedy or tragedy, the answer is clearly both. It isn't humanly possible to have one without the other as Woody knows all too well.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Master Haywood

Master Haywood

I can't help it, it's been since Sweet and Low Down since seeing an Allen film hasn't been a sad waste of time. Perhaps he should change his ethic around, instead of one half way decent film a year, how about one Manhattan every four years - let's put it to a vote?

Woodster

Woodster

I would vote yes on Master Haywood's referendum, I think most of us feel Mr. Allen makes too many movies. As one critic put it, you know another Allen film is due when the quart of milk you bought on your way home from his last one is starting to smell funny in the fridge.

Every time The Woodman finishes a new film, moviegoers hope it will return him to the salad days of Annie Hall and Zelig. But the results are usually disappointing (Hollywood Ending,) or downright awful (like The Curse of the Jade Scorpion).

Allen himself feels making a movie shouldn't be that big a deal - you write it, direct it, then zip right along to the next one. But I agree with the last respondant, he'd have more consistent success if he spent more time refining his projects.

The good news about "Melinda and Melinda" is that it shows real reflection on Allen's part, mostly about tensions between optimism and pessimism. I would venture to say that this harkens back to his good stuff more closely than anything since Deconstructing Harry

The Boneman

The Boneman

I liked the fact that Woody played off of My Dinner With Andre, using an old Allen-flick standy by Wallace Shawn to interesting ends. The premise of the film, however, just does not work because you never get the sense of either v ignette being any more funny or tragic than the other. Certainly the funny vignette comes up well short of Woody Allen funny standards, and as compared to say a tragedy like Stardust Memories, the tragedy end is no great shakes either. The first half of the film suffered from these relatively unseasoned actors struggling to make Woody words sound natural and conversational. As I listened to the labored dialogue, I could picture Woody writing away, with little regard to whether these flavor of the month actors would be able to make his patented style of banter work. It smooths out in the second half of the film, but never fully gets there. It was an interesting idea for a film, but there just wasn't a dramatic enough difference between the feel of the comedy and the tragedy to even keep it straight which of which. Here's hoping that Match Point will find the Woodman back on center court.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!