zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous (2005)

Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous
Cast members from the original film were compelled to reprise their roles because of the sequel's brilliant script.

Starring:

Sandra Bullock
Regina King
Treat Williams
William Shatner

Released By:

Warner Brothers

Released In:

2005

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

D


Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous should quickly be filed under the "sequels that never should have been made" file. Like Legally Blonde 2: Red, White, and Blonde, it's one of those painful follow-ups that has no purpose but to make a quick buck. I suppose this Sandra Bullock flick isn't quite as dreadful as Legally Blonde 2, but at least the Reese Witherspoon dud was a sequel to a better, more likable movie. The original Miss Congeniality wasn't that good to begin with and now, we've been subjected to the further adventures of a character who was never interesting at all.

In Miss Congeniality 2, tough cop Gracie Hart (Sandra Bullock) finds it difficult to shake her recent celebrity status. It's only been a few weeks since her infamous crime bust in the first picture, and everywhere she goes, she is recognizable - rendering her near useless in undercover cases. Before long, her department finds a more useful (or more congenial if you will)
position for her. Soon, Gracie finds herself involved in a new case revolving around the kidnapping of Karen Krantz, the crowned beauty from the first movie. Paired with bitter, tough as nails fellow cop Sam Fuller (played by Regina King in a role that has no relation to The Big Red One director), the two must set aside their world of differences and work together to foil the kidnappers.

Sandra Bullock used to have that sweet "girl-next-door" appeal. It worked for her in movies like Speed and While You Were Sleeping, but it doesn't work much anymore. Her snorts and various pratfalls are meant to be endearing, but mostly, everything she does in this picture is either annoying or forgettable. Regina King is fun to watch as a "mad-as-hell-and-I'm-not-going-to-take-it- anymore" type but her character hardly serves a purpose, and after watching her scorching turn in Ray, this movie seems like a bad misstep for her. Only a goofy William Shatner is able to make the proceedings somewhat less painful.

The screenplay is bordering on atrocious. I don't see how or why all the contributing parties wanted to be involved. The movie is neither funny or charming. What's more, it's rushed and clumsy. Take for instance the fashion in which Benjamin Bratt's character Eric Matthews from the first film, is exorcized in this sequel. There's a scene in the early portion of the film in which Eric dumps Gracie over the phone. It's an unbelievable cheap shot - presumably included because Bullock couldn't convince Bratt to reprise his role. Good going Benjamin. The movie ditches romance and instead focuses on the hostile attitude that Bullock and King have towards each other. Attitude we all know will inevitably change to a grudging respect by the end of the movie. (Had this dramatic change of heart resulted in a steamy lesbian scene, there might have been a reason to make this movie - no such luck).

There are many out there who will, no doubt, think I'm being far too hard on this movie. I'm first to admit that I'm not exactly Miss Congeniality 2's target audience, but I have to tell you - it was borderline torture to sit through. Not because it was offensive or unfunny, but because there never seemed to be anything happening. They should have subtitled this movie Unarmed and Fatuous.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Crap floats

Crap floats

Quite honestly I think a D is awfully generous. You're right the first film was just barely watchable and when I heard they had put together a sequel I couldn't beleive what I was hearing. Put this one in with other Bullock bon mots such as Hope Floats, Gun Shy, wait a minute, has she been in a good movie??????

daneek

daneek

havnt watched but it looks good ne way! going to see it on saturday!!!!!!

Paul

Paul

Why? Is the only word I can think of to describe my feelings about crap like this? I've recently seen films like Closer and Sideways which truly restore one's enthusiasm in the art of film, and both of these films did reasonably well. So why do we have to even think about a sequel to a movie that was just awful in it's original form Why?

Sir Dizzy

Sir Dizzy

The story catches up with FBI agent Gracie Hart (Sandra Bullock) shortly after she successfully disarmed a threat against the Miss United States Pageant while working undercover as a contestant in Miss Congeniality. Having become a media celebrity following her heroic pageant exploits, Gracie has been spending more time lately at the salon than the shooting range, working the talk show circuit and promoting her book. When her friends, pageant winner Cheryl and emcee Stan, are kidnapped in Las Vegas, Gracie's all-out efforts to jump back into action to save them puts her at loggerheads with the FBI top brass who don't want to risk losing their mascot and fear she might not be up to the job anymore.

Why for the love of god why? I really wish studio execs would ask themselves this question every time they decide to green light a movie for a sequel. Most movies don't need sequels or do sequels work very well with those particular movies sadly Miss Congeniality 2 happens to fall in both those categories. The reason the first movie worked was because the story was new and fresh, the characters were interesting, the plot was well defined and mostly because the movie was funny. Except for the last part because Miss Congeniality 2 could be funny at times the sequel failed because it lost the first three parts that made the original good. We are familiar with the story it's the same tough girl goes soft routine and the characters are no different as they are basically the same rehash as before and the movie does not define a plot just felling that trumping on its laurels is enough rather than doing anything new or funny.

I wonder if Sandra Bullock feels that she has entered into a slump playing the same old characters and never really truly finding away to expand on any acting talents she has. She has been playing the same basic loveable character since 1994's Speed and if she soon doesn't find something more dynamic and challenging she will fade from Hollywood pretty soon. She is no longer the cute loveable go to girl as she gets older but rather the trusty old actress that you hope can find one more performance before she disappears. She does nothing in the movie that she did not do in the original but the first time around she was a lot funnier as the character had more heart. The movie is your typical afternoon fair, funny at times, unfunny at others all the while playing out the same old story you have seen before, you could easily just wait for the video.

heba hassan

heba hassan

while you were sleeping was a good movie

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!