zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

Saw (2004)

Saw
Elwes, takes a photo with the President who was in office the last time he had top billing in a feature film.

Starring:

Carey Elwes
Danny Glover
Leigh Whammell

Released By:

Lions Gate

Released In:

2004

Rated:

R

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

C+


Saw is, perhaps, one of the most buzzed about horror pictures of the year. Along with the likes of Haute Tension, Open Water and Shaun of the Dead, it has been talked up on several fan sites since it's debut at the Sundance Film Festival. Naturally, I was quite curious as I love the horror genre and was unable to see this one at Sundance. Lucky for me, Lions Gate threw a special screening of the picture for Comic-Con attendees.

As Saw opens, a man (Leigh Whannell) awakens submerged in a bathtub. As he bursts from the tub and desperately attempts to catch his breath, he finds that he is stranded in room of darkness. After a few moments, he realizes he is not alone. As the lights flicker on, he discovers that he is chained by his ankle, and stranded in a rather large, unkept restroom. On the other side of the bathroom is a chained Carey Elwes who has just barely regained consciousness himself. At the center of the restroom is a dead man laying face down in a puddle of blood with a gun in one hand and a tape recorder in the other. Before long, Whannell and Elwes find themselves in a sick game waged by a sadistic serial killer with true creativity on his side.

Saw starts off strong as we discover what the killer wants. The movie even becomes more terrifying when we see what this sadistic fiend is capable of through a series of horrific flashbacks that reveal the most twisted methods of death since John Doe's in David Fincher's brilliant Seven. For a while it looks as if Saw might breathe life into a seemingly dead genre (movies about serial killers have pretty much run their course).

Seriously, if you are the slightest bit squeamish, you are not going to want to see the ways in which this killer offs his victims.

Sadly, the movie sort of falls apart in the second half as it strives to shift suspicion from one suspect to the next. Is it the burnt out cop (played by an unispired Danny Glover) is it the good but flawed doctor (played by Carey Elwes) Is it the sleazy photographer (played by co-screenwriter Leigh Whannell) Or is it someone we may not have been introduced to yet

The whole movie unfolds in a jigsaw puzzle fashion and was quite obviously inspired by The Usual Suspects and the previously mentioned Seven.

Saw isn't without it's inspired moments. As I stated, the ways in which the killer has his earlier victims dispposed of, are quite terrifying, and the climax of the picture--in which the killer is revealed--is well shot (most notably, I liked the nifty little wink at The Texas Chainsaw Massacre), but it's also quite flawed, and I question how the killer was able to pull certain things off. Obviously, it's hard for me to go into this stuff, because I don't want to reveal the killer's identity, so you'll have to judge for yourself.

The soon to be released Haute Tension suffers from a ridiculous twist, but ultimately, I think it creeped me out more than this picture did. True, it was more by the numbers, but I found it scarier.

What I disliked most about Saw were the performances, most notably leads Elwes and Whannell. They just didn't sell it at all, and the final act evoked laughter from some of the audience I saw it with. Elwes' sense of panic and yearning to protect his family is overplayed. They say that acting is acting like your not acting. Elwes seemed like he was acting. Whannell tries, but his inexperience shows. In the end, I think stronger performances could have made all the difference in the world. You have to believe that these men are going through this, and it never felt real to me.

As for the title, it does have meaning, but I'll be damned if I'm going to spoil it in this review. I've lightened up a bit in my approach to writing this piece. When the movie was over, I wasn't impressed, but having since thought about it a bit, there are some terrifically terryfying sequences to be found in Saw. It's also well shot and edited. This movie has nothing on Open Water or Shaun of the Dead, but it does have it's moments.

On a final note, at press time, Saw had been slapped with an NC-17 rating which I don't understand at all. Yes it's grusome, but it's more than worthy of an R rating.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Adam

Adam

Hi everyone. Damn if Saw wasn't a movie I wanted to love. I just watched the trailer, and it really makes the movie look better than it actually is. How many times has that happened? The movie isn't horrible. It has some terrifically twisted scenes in it and I love the cinematography and editing. It's just that Carey Elwes and Leigh Whannell- try as they might-- never made me believe, nor does a usually dependable Danny Glover (he seems to stagger aimlessly through the entire film). There are performances that are effective including a small turn by an extremely convincing Shawnee Smith (you may remember her from 80's flicks like Who's Harry Crumb and Summer School as well as that underrated remake of The Blob) as a woman put through the ringer in one of those previously mentioned twisted scenes. I suppose though, that in the end, this is really a movie about style, and it has plenty of that. Still, Saw never really works at the same level as The Usual Suspects and Seven, two pictures that clearly inspired it.

some kid

some kid

yea, this movie isnt rated nc-17. It was originally rated that but they decided to re-edit it and its now rated R

M Jones

M Jones

this film was amazing. i cannot see how you can say that it did not touch open water!! OPEN WATER was the worst film i have ever seen the whole thing was pointless, and if it has been classed on true events how do they know that they were stung by jelly fish and sharks took bites here and there, and that he died before she died.

SAW is an absolute classic with a good twist. ok i agree that the acting was not all that but the story of the movie overpowers that and you forget about the acting. id rate this film 10/10.

Adam

Adam

Some Kid,

Thanks for the heads up. We've adjusted that. After I saw the film, I figured they'd re-work it. And in all honesty, I've seen grislier movies that obtained the "R" rating but what else is new. The MPAA is always doing crap like that.

M Jones,

I liked Open Water because it was subtle and it put you right out there in the middle of the ocean with those two characters. And while it isn't necessarily plot driven, it's hardly pointless. It's a tale of surival shot in real time, and the ending haunted me.

Saw is well shot and the editing superb but the actors don't sell it. I enjoyed the revelation at the end of the film but thought the entire picture as a whole too closely resembled two much better movies; Seven and The Usual Suspects.

I give high marks to the film makers for creating a truly twisted killer and putting victims in unique peril, but ultimately, Carey Elwes drained the movie of tension for me.

Truth be told, I saw several movies that day including the glorious Shaun of the Dead, the creative Sky Captain, and the nightmarish The Machinist, so maybe my overwhelming response to the first two made it harder for me to get into Saw. I'll check it out again when it's released in October, but I'm confident that I'll still have the same problem with it; a boring Carey Elwes.

I'm glad you liked it though.

Cara

Cara

Loved the film but I agree, the acting was appauling! As for the constant barrage of people questioning the ability of the killer to pull off some of his tricks-IT'S A FILM, FICTIONAL, therefore who cares if it was realistic? It was a good movie which provided a some what sadistic form of entertainment! ps. Where was the Texas Chainsaw Massacre influence?

Adam

Adam

Hi Cara,

I appreciate that this is just a movie, but sometimes a certain kind of logic is essential. I don't want to ruin the film's big surprise so I wont go any further. Having said that, I really liked the way the film was put together, but found the writing sub par and the performances boardering on laughable. As for the the Texas Chainsaw Massacre influence, I thought the last frame of the picture--in which a certain character slams a sliding door shut--reminiscent of a similar move performed by Leatherface. It was a nice wink to a horror classic. Aside from that though, I was most reminded of The Usual Suspects and Seven. Not a horrible movie, but definitely a let down for me. The sequel is presently in the works for an October 2005 release.

Cody B

Cody B

Dude you missed the boat on this one - best thrill-ride of the year. I get sopissed off when I read put downs for saw and glowing reviews for crap like open water and shaun of the dead - neither of those films scared me in the bit, while saw had me gripping the chair the whole film. What a monster for the ages, creepy, violent bloody - hello it was scarywhat you want

melissa

melissa

I saw this movie last night, and i thought is was really good. I do agree with your review in the way that elwes' overacted. I thought the story line was good and it kept me guessing until the very last five seconds. I liked how the plot twists, it keeps it entertaining. I don't think this movie is for the people who don't likw gore. I usually don't squimmer at blood, but this movie did make me shiver. I give it a B.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!