zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

The Passion of The Christ (2004)

The Passion of The Christ
"Brave Art."

Starring:

Jim Caviezel
Monica Bellucci
Maia Morgernstern

Released By:

Newmarket Film Group

Released In:

2004

Rated:

R

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

A


Wow! I've just returned from a screening of The Passion of the Christ, a film that has already stirred up a good deal of controversy. And, to be honest, I'm at quite a loss for words to describe this amazing film.

Let me start by saying that I'm not a religious person. I do believe in God and I have read the bible, but I don't attend church on a regular basis and I wouldn't say I belong to any one faith.

I've enjoyed a number of other films that have depicted the life of Christ or portions thereof. Some based on Biblical accounts (the outstanding The Greatest Story Ever Told) and others that take a more provocative and even speculative approach (see Martin Scorsese's brilliant Last Temptation of Christ).

What Mel Gibson does in The Passion of the Christ is give us an unflinching look at the final twelve agonizing hours of Christ's life, and he does so in breathtaking, authentic fashion. But everyone should also be warned that this picture is extremely graphic, realistic and relentless in it's scenes of unimaginable brutality. Gibson and his team re-create these final hours with a fearless attention to these savage details, so much so in fact that I found myself moved to tears on several occasions.

Is all this violence necessary? I guess that depends on your views. It's clear here that Gibson wants us to gain a better understanding of what Jesus willingly subjected himself to because of his love for us. Therefore, I wouldn't call the graphic brutality in this picture gratuitous, but it may be extremely uncomfortable for many to sit through. There were people who walked out of the screening I attended, not because they were offended, but simply because they could not bear to watch it. I must confess, that moments were even tough for me to handle, and having seen countless violent films, I've become somewhat callous to it.

And in another incredibly bold move, Gibson opted to shoot this entire film in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew (with English subtitles) adding to it's intricately detailed authenticity. So you should be aware of the fact that this is a film that requires you to read along.

The look of this film is astonishing. Francesco Frigeri's art direction, Maurizio Millenotti's costume design, Caleb Deschanel's breathtaking cinematography, Greg Cannom's make-up, and John Debney's gorgeous musical score (perhaps the best of his career), make this an event rather then a mere movie experience. I'd also like to give a special thanks to Newmarket Film Group for having the courage and vision to release this picture (they were also instrumental in getting Whale Rider and Monster released).

Jim Caviezel's portrayal of Christ is incredibly intimate and this is certainly a star making turn, although I'm quite certain that this did not figure into his decision to accept the role. Caviezel purports to be a deeply religious person and he took the role after much convincing on the part of Gibson. The anguish he endures during this film is painfully real. But the scenes in which he comforts those around him are heartbreakingly effective. Caviezel embodies spirituality and strength and it is through his nearly sealed eyes and blood soaked body that we experience and gain insight into this extraordinarily horrific event.

Maia Morgenstern is stunning as Mary. Her despair and exhaustion as she witnesses the suffering and death of her son is beyond gut-wrenching. This is an amazing performance.

Not surprisingly, The Passion of the Christ has become the topic of much debate - particularly from those groups who would criticize the film as being anti-Semitic. While I sympathize with these people and understand their concerns, I whole-heartedly disagree. In my opionion it is mankind who is on trial here, and if you consider Christ's mission to be a fait accompli, then there are really no villains. At any rate, after watching Schindler's List, I didn't feel contempt for the entire German race - then or now.

It is sad and unfortunate that the history of the human race is rife with shameful examples of intolerance, genocide and persecution. And as we've all seen in the past several years these things are still going on as you read this. To condemn all Jews, for Christ's death, would be no different than condemning all Caucasians for the treatment of negroes during the Slavery era, I could go on forever with these examples. It also seems fair to mention at this point, that two of the most salient aspects of Christ's teachings involved forgiveness and also the grace to turn the other cheek. I would hope that if there's one thing that this film should impress upon those who watch it, is that persecution and violence is never justified.

It should also be noted that this film depicts the last twelve hours of Christ's life. It was this portion of the story that Gibson found the most compelling and powerful. Suffice it to say, there was much that came before it. So if you're looking for good source material as to the back-story, you all know where to find it.

As I watched this picture it was clear to me that Gibson has enormous passion for this project. He's risked a lot to bring it to the screen. Many of you are thinking to yourselves; "Risks? This guy's rich!" That hardly matters. This movie was very important to him, so much in fact, that he funded the film himself despite the disapproval of many around him. In fact at the horrific moment where we are about to see the nail hammered through the hand of the Christ, Caviezel hesitated a moment before he offered his hand. I've read that, rather than put anyone else through this gut-wrenching detail of the crucifixion, it is actually Gibson's hand that you see in this scene.

I have to admire him for his courage of conviction. He's fashioned a powerful film that I don't think I'll ever forget. This is merely his interpretation and there will, no doubt, be people out there irritated by stylistic choices he's made (such as the numerous shots of a Satan figure lurking in background), but that's the beauty of the film medium.

I was very moved by The Passion of the Christ. It was extremely painful watching Christ's slow, torturous trek as he bore the very cross toward his own crucifixion (a sequence that unfolds in real time), but it was this realism that I appreciated. Every fall, every savage blow he recieved to prompt him forward, and every profoundly moving glance he offered his brutal captors, make for what will surely be the most emotionally powerful movie of the year.

After all, this is the story that all Christians base their fatih upon - the son of God driven to the utmost capacity of human suffering in order that one day we may all be forgiven or saved. This film dares to examine the very crux of the human condition and, for this, Gibson is to be applauded.

The Passion of the Christ is obviously not a film one will want to view for entertainment value. It's deadly serious and honest in it's depiction of quite possibly the most important event in history (if you believe). And even if you're not a believer, it would be extremely difficult to deny the sheer power of this poetically devastating cinematic experience.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Greenlight

Greenlight

Nicely done Mr. Adam Mast - very well written, but take it from someone who's studied it in it's most minute detail, you're wrong about this film not being anti-Semitic. It most definitely is - and all it would have taken was the slightest surcease from the dogmatic portrayal of the chief Pharisee, or open dissent or discussion from one of his colleagues and everything would have been different. It would have been a far less biased depiction, but as it stands these sins of ommission are probably going to cost the film dearly once they start scattering Oscar noms around. Ironically, this films greatest accolade will be it's mind-boggling box-office. Turn some of the profit to charity will you Mel?

Griswald

Griswald

I really don't understand all this hullabaloo about this film being anti-Semitic? Of course it's anti-Semitic, if the Jewish faith denies the existence of Christ and all of the events that surround his life - then by that logic National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation is anti-Semitic. No?

Adam

Adam

Griswald,

That's an excellent point, and one I pondered while writing the review. However, I think most of the friction comes from people who feel that the Jewish characters in the film were potrayed as single-minded and one-dimensional. This is what the last post suggests. I think that their denying involvement (if they were involved-depending on what you believe) is a seperate issue. While it's true that the movie might have benefited from deeper characterizations, I never thought the movie anti-simitic. I did not walk out of that film with hatred or disgust towards the Jewish community. That's not even what The Passion of the Christ is about. But that's what everyone wants to make it about. Quite simply, this is a movie. For me, it was a powerful one. By the way, that Christmas Vacation bit was hilarious. Do you want a job?

Robert Wood

Robert Wood

I believe Mel Gibson's film 'The Passion of Christ' is not anti-semitic, but a true portrayal of what our Savior's death was really like. The woman who portrays Mary in the film is herself Jewish.

Mark Roderick

Mark Roderick

Your a moron. You read one thing and think you know it all. I am a history major and you are even wrong about the "fact" that you gave. First of all, the empire of rome declared him messiah. There were home groups, or today called Churches during Jesus' actually life. We have actually documents written by eye witnesses. Roman scholars even detested to Jesus' life. You are saying that over 100 documents mandated by archealogists to be from that time, all lied and made a up a story, in which all these people who do not know each other. You are now and forever declared a MORON.

MIranda

MIranda

To Mark

I haven't talked to Mel lately but I'm pretty sure that the devil lurking around in the crowed and in the shadows was supposed to be an attempt at reminding us that temptation of The Christ was also apart of what Jesus endured;not just the physical torture. The temptation of giving in was certainly apart of scripture, I don't see how you can really take issue with how that got transferred into the movie adaptation.

As far as there not being a prophesy of a Christ? The old testament is in fact full of prophecies of the coming of The Christ. In-fact it was what the Jewish leaders had Jesus killed for, Blasphemy since many of Jesus' followers started referring to him as the fulfillment of old scripture, the one prophesied. It was who John the Baptist was mistaken for, but in fact he too was for told as being the one who would pave the way ..

If you don't believe Jesus to be The Christ, that's ok with me. I'm not one that really feels moved to convert anyone. But I will take issue with you in saying that there was no prophecy of the coming of The Lord, The Christ, The Atonement, The Fulfillment of the old scriptures... ect.. It is in fact what Christianity is based on and why the first Christians were in-fact all Jewish. The early converts didn't look at themselves as leaving Judaism. The believed they were witnessing the fulfillment of Judaism.

Paul Mozworth

Paul Mozworth

I thought that the violence was a little over the top in spots too...to the point of annoyance. The movie was okay at best. Personally I found the movie to be most engaging when it focused on the people around Jesus instead of when it focused on Jesus himself. I wish that there had been more time spent on Jesus in the living years instead of simply in the dying hours...I understand that it is about the passion but Jesus is much more than a piece of meat to be butchered and that is all he is in this movie.

Passion bears fruit

Passion bears fruit

A man who said Mel Gibson's film "The Passion of The Christ" led him to confess that he murdered his girlfriend pleaded guilty to the crime in a Texas court on Wednesday.

"I assume full responsibility for my actions," Dan Leach told Judge Brady Elliott just as his trial on murder charges was set to start. "I plead guilty."

A jury which had been selected to hear the case now will decide his punishment, which could be up to life in prison. Leach, 21, said he killed girlfriend Ashley Nicole Wilson in January because she said she was pregnant and he wanted nothing more to do with her.

Leach set up the murder to look like a suicide by getting Wilson, 19, to write a list of all the things wrong in her life and place a pillowcase over her head as a "trust exercise."

When she could not see, he strangled her with a cord that was also tied around the headboard of her bed. An autopsy showed Wilson was not pregnant, officials said.

Police interpreted the list as a suicide note and ruled the death a suicide until March, when Leach saw Gibson's movie about the crucifixion of Christ and felt compelled to confess.

Unfortunate that the man didn't see the film sooner

Clint

Clint

I've been away for sometime, I'll let you figure that one out, but I've just now seen the passion and I wanted to make my feelings on the subject clear - as I've followed your website it has always impressed me for it's love for film and honesty so I've chosen this forum to write the following: "The Passion" is ultimately a movie -- and a masterful one at that, obviously the work of an extremely talented filmmaker. The pacing of the story is beautifully measured. The intercutting between Jesus' early years, the Last Supper, the Sermon on the Mount, and the final hours of his life not only flesh out the story, but also offer relief from the unrelenting violence in scene after scene graphically displaying the torture leading up to Christ's agonizingly slow death on the cross.

After seeing "The Passion," it is my opinion that it is not anti-Semitic, nor do I believe Gibson promotes any such feelings in the film. But it is also very clear that anyone who is predisposed towards anti-Semitism could easily twist this film to fit his or her own agenda. This, however, is nothing new. People have been distorting the Bible to fit their own beliefs for centuries.

Buff

Buff

I can't believe this film is not being considered for any awards? Is every member of the Academy a Jew? You'd think that at least the Hollywood Foreign Press would have demonstrated some balls. No Jim Caviezel for best actor that's just sinful.

Jody

Jody

The Passion of the Christ was without question the most impressive film of the year, yet just like the teachings of it's subject, this film has been forgotten. I can't believe Gibson isn't being considered for best director - it's the most courageous job of film direction maybe ever, Yea verily somebody's head is up their ass.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!