zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

The Terminal (2004)

The Terminal
Terminal

Starring:

Tom Hanks
Catherine Zeta-Jones
Stanley Tucci

Released By:

Dreamworks Pictures

Released In:

2004

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

B


The Terminal was a film I was greatly looking forward to. I've always had an affection for Steven Spielberg. I grew up on his movies in the 70's and 80's and while I wouldn't call him the greatest film maker of all time (I'm the first to admit that there are a few films on his resume that didn't really do it for me), he is my sentimental favorite and probably always will be.

The idea of another team effort between he and Tom Hanks was incredibly appealing as both of their previous collaborations (the stirring World War II epic Saving Private Ryan and the breezy Catch Me if You Can) were outstanding.

The Terminal features Hanks as Viktor Navorski, a European immigrant making his way to New York City. Upon arrival at the airport, Viktor immediately finds his life turned upside down. It seems that during his flight there was a coupe in his homeland, plunging it into political turmoil. This creates an incredibly odd and complex situation as Viktor is no longer a recognized citizen of any given country. Until the ordeal can be resolved, he is forced to spend his passing days as a resident in the busy terminal, as ordered by Frank Dixon , the high and mighty chief of immigrant relations at the airport.

This film is loosely based upon a true story that is very similar - Spielberg and writers Andrew Niccol, Sacha Gervasi, and Jeff Nathanson have included plot elements of their own (such as a love story), and ultimately, The Terminal plays as a sort of old fashioned (and extremely idealistic) picture that one might have seen in the 40's or 50's. This is to say that The Terminal has a kind of innocence and sweetness about it that is hard to resist.

Tom Hanks really is an amazing performer and has been for years. In fact, he's so good that he's often taken for granted. People just sort of expect the best from him. Once again, he shines here as a man caught in a tough situation. In the early goings of the picture, he frantically tries to communicate with the busy Americans coming and going in the Airport, but is usually unsuccessful, making things all the more frustrating for him. The communication element in The Terminal reminded me a little of Sophia Coppola's Lost in Translation. Hanks' accent is realistic and inside the first ten minutes of the film, I did forget who I was watching. There is no better compliment you can pay an actor than that. Hanks is also given the opportunity to do some great physical bits here, and it was fun watching him get a chance to stretch his comical chops again (which he also did in the recent Ladykillers). Add to these elements the likability factor that comes with Hanks' persona, and you have another winning performance from the actor.

The film is about Hanks' Navorski, but there are other likable performances to be found. The wonderful Kumar Pallana, and Diego Luna (Y' Tu Mama Tambien) play various airport workers who befriend Navorski throughout the course of his ordeal. All are terrific if a tad one dimensional.

For what it's worth, Catherine Zeta-Jones really downplays her role as main love interest Amelia. This is a different kind of part for the Welsh actress, and as good as she is here, I didn't care for the way the character was written. She's a woman who constantly finds herself involved with the wrong men, but then, when she finally finds the right guy, she sort of backs off. How many times have we seen that scenario in a film? On the other hand, I sort of liked where Spielberg and his writing team take the Viktor/Amelia relationship.

Stanley Tucci plays the heavy here, and while he is effective I didn't care for the way his character was written either. He felt overly callous to me, and at times, I thought that his character and the friction he causes should have been left out of the film entirely. But then the extra tension and conflict he brings to the story sort of needs to be there to take the film where it goes.

Steven Spielberg directs The Terminal with a very light touch and this movie would serve as a nice companion piece to Catch Me if You Can (albeit not as effective). Both films are light on their feet, and both feature lead characters who are more or less motivated by their father. And while watching The Terminal, it's as apparent as ever that Spielberg loves the movies (as well as jazz music).

The Terminal is beautifully shot. Spielberg perfectly captures the busy, frantic nature of an airport, and veteran cinematographer Janusz Kaminski glides his camera effortlessly through the contained surroundings, making them appear bigger than they actually are. Kaminski is a true pro and this is some of his most stunning work.

As the E.T. director did back in the day, Spielberg really wears his emotions on his sleeve with this piece. Unlike more recent efforts (A.I. and Minority Report), The Terminal isn't really interested in edgier fare. This film is fluffy and this will, no doubt, turn many people off. I enjoyed it for the most part, but would be lying if I said I didn't roll my eyes back a couple of times.

There are sequences that are a tad tough to swallow. Pallana's big scene towards the end of the picture didn't work for me, and there are a couple of blatantly pat scenes (including a romantic dinner between two of the film's main characters and a couple of other things I don't want to spoil) that are a little too cute for their own good. And finally, The Terminal really could have benefited from a tighter running time.

Many will argue that the film doesn't have a realistic character to speak of, and that nearly every supporting player is merely on hand to serve Hanks' Navorski. In fact, I just barely read a review that went so far as to deem the movie racist. I certainly saw a different film than this guy did. The Terminal is simplistic , harmless, and without a mean bone in it's body. And the movie may be idealistic but many of Spielberg's films are. This isn't necessarily the real world, but it is a world that would be nice to live in. As far as the racist issue, if the minority workers in the airport went around shooting up the place, it might be a different story, but this is not the case. Just because the film features a janitor from India doesn't make the picture racist. I guess it all boils down to how one perceives things. If you seek that sort of stuff out, I guess you'll find it.

At any rate, I would not rank The Terminal among Spielberg's strongest work. But it certainly isn't his worst (in my humble opinion, that dubious honor goes to The Lost World).

In the end it's really hard to deny the pure charm of this movie, despite it's obvious flaws. What little in this movie doesn't work, kind of turns into an afterthought. Spielberg and Hanks do work their magic and make a great team. While The Terminal is based upon an actual event, it is, stylistically speaking, an old fashioned movie--gentle and pure. It's also a film about good people helping one another (with the obvious exception, of Tucci's Dixon), and in this day and age, you can't ask for more..

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Hank Yanker

Hank Yanker

The terminal is aptly named because it really didn't seem to go anywhere. The story actually is based upon a man in France who has chosen to live in an Airport - so it's a bit of a stretch to say that it's based on any kind of true story.

I agree with you on two major points, it was rather amazing how much Tom Hanks disappeared into this character. He did so in equal measure to Jim Carrey's vanishing act in Eternal Sunshine. I also didn't feel like there was anything racist about the film. Whoever said that was just some sort of muckraker. The films biggest problem was deciding what it wanted to be. I think it floundered in that respect and your B rating is a gift.

Brent Watson

Brent Watson

I found the The Terminal, to be too inconsistent - it couldn't make up it's mind what kind of film to be. But as the case with all of Spielberg's work there are more than a few diamonds in the rough. Of particular note is Stanley Tucci's performance as Frank Dixon, a perfectly constructed authority figure fascist in Capra mode who never becomes the cartoon his character could have been. I thought Spielberg found his wittiest and most insightful camera placement in a moment where Dixon and his law-enforcement entourage stand ominously above a Borders bookstore sign. That was vintange. Overall, despite a another fine performance from Hanks - thumbs down.

Mark Attenburrough

Mark Attenburrough

I think it's sad that the Spielberg of The Terminal seems content to fall back on crude slapstick that, unlike Oprah's numerous pratfalls in The Color Purple, are less a product of soulful insight than they are shameless crowd-pleasers. These sections of The Terminal extend directly from the character of Gupta (Kumar Pallana), an airport janitor who gets off on watching people slip and fall on his wet floors. There's a sense of class-war retribution to Gupta's smirks, though his pleasure never develops into anything profound. I really would have loved to love this film but it just seemed awkward and uncertain of itself in far too many stetches.

Carter Banning

Carter Banning

The Terminal is a heartwarming, funny movie that has some flaws, but none that are bad enough to ruin the pure enjoyment of this warmhearted tale. You'll love it for Tom Hanks. He is magical as Viktor who must get by on his own ingenuity, some luck, and the kindness of strangers who grow to love the man and his struggle. He is Cast Away in an airport instead of a desert island this time, but he's still funny and able to charm us. You'll fall in love with him as he struggles to learn English (with an accent that sounds real), feel sorry for him as he tries to make some money to buy food, and find inspiration in each little victory. Hanks is one of those actors who makes you root for him, and this character plays well to that ability. And as you mentioned in your review all but unrecognizable before you know it

Marsha Leigh

Marsha Leigh

My biggest problem with The Terminal was the dangling sub-plots. Particularly underdeveloped was the one that involved Diego Luna - a kind airline catering employee who falls in love with one of the customs agents. This part of the story had so much potential but that love story, which is vital to the early part of The Terminal, is dropped too soon. Spielberg picks up the thread later when he must have realized that it was unresolved. Luna is able to draw that same sympathy from the audience, but quickly is pushed to the side when Spielberg decides to focus on Viktor's growing infatuation with an airline stewardess, Amelia (Catherine Zeta-Jones). This and the callous character played by Tucci hurt the film too much for me to really recommend it. It became frustrating to me, even though there was plenty of Spielberg's heartfelt touches - still he seemed as uncertain of himself as I've seen since Hook.

Spielberg ?

Spielberg ?

I was touched by this heartwarming film, and for that I could overlook any flaws that you pointed out. I can't remember the last feel good film that Spielberg has done? I don't count Catch Me in that category.

Schaefling

Schaefling

This is one of those movies which is great right up until the end and then unexpectedly takes a ninety degree turn and dives off a cliff into oblivion.

(Spoiler Alert) The movie starts to focus on our hero, Victor, and the love of his life, Amelia, in the second half and then fails to follow through. After Victor breaks into a United Airlines terminal to get info on Amelia, arranges a private dinner for her, and builds a magnificent fountain for her, he doesn't have the guts to fight for her in the end. In fact, although he is willing to go toe to toe with the security chief of JFK for almost an entire year, he never even tries to talk to Amelia when she gives him some cliche line about how she warned him she could not be relied upon to pick the right guy in the end.

To make matters worse Amelia arranges to get a one day Visa for Victor so he can fulfill a promise to his dead father and get the last signature of 58 jazz musicians when she could simply have gotten the signature in person herself and then given it personally to Victor. Instead she persoanlly self-destructs by getting back with her loser married boyfriend who arranges the one day Visa for Victor apparrently in return for their getting back together and her dumping Victor forever.

And what's truly ironic is that the dead father never got the other 57 signatures in person. All of them were sent to him in the mail. In fact, you have to think the dead father was turning over in the grave hoping his son would fight for the woman of his dreams rather than meekly going off with his tail between his legs to get a signature in person he could so easily have gotten simply by calling over to the Ramada Inn by phone asking the Jazz star to send him a signature in the mail. But then, in my opinion, the whole ending was just phoned in by Steven Spielberg, leaving a bad taste in my mouth and a sense of acute disappointment that a potentially great movie totally lost its way right at the end.

Shepard

Shepard

The dumb dialogue between security and Hanks drove me nuts; it seemd as though it would take forever for them to figure out that this guy couldn't speak English. I love Tom Hanks, but walked out on him after about 15 minutes. His acting was great, but I needed a better overall movie experience.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!