zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

The Village (2004)

The Village
"Which one of you called me the Village Idiot?"

Starring:

Joaquin Phoenix
Adrien Brody
Bryce Howard
William Hurt

Released By:

Touchstone Pictures

Released In:

2004

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

B-


The Village is the latest twister from M. Night Shyamalan, and because of The Sixth Sense's grand and unexpected twist ending, he's not only raised the bar for his own films but others as well. Since the release of that dramatic ghost story, it's hard to go into a thriller not expecting some sort of clever twist by the end.

The Village is a period piece and tells the story of a peaceful community that is surrounded by ominous woods where--as legend would have it--mystical creatures dwell. Through the years, the villagers and the creatures have come to an understanding. The townsfolk are prohibited from entering the woods, while the creatures are to respect the boundaries of the village. One dark evening, however, the mystical monsters do cross over prompting the villagers to re-evaluate their long-standing arrangement.

Let me just put you up on one fact right here and now - The Village is not a horror film. It has a few scary moments, but that isn't really what the movie is about, though the trailer would certainly have you expecting thrills and chills. As is the case with most of Shyamalan's pictures, it's all about perception.

For those wondering if there is a twist - yes, as a matter of fact, there are several. Unfortunately, I knew the big one going in, as I made the fatal mistake of reading an article about the film on a fan site. Still, even while aware of part of what was going to happen in this movie, I was mildly engrossed.

Surprisingly, there are only three stand out performances to speak of in The Village, and this is odd given it's a pretty impressive cast. Bryce Dallas Howard (daughter of director Ron Howard) is absolutely stunning in this picture. This is a role that was originally intended for Kirsten Dunst, but I'm happy that Howard got the part. She has an angelic beauty about her, and she proves to have quite the dramatic range. While this is her first big part, I suspect we'll be seeing much more of her in the future. Joaquin Phoenix is quietly effective as the soft spoken Lucius, a villager who is willing to venture into the woods in order to provide for the village. Adrien Brody is fantastic as Noah, a mentally challenged man with an unhealthy obsession. And once again, Shyamalan makes an Alfred Hitchcock style appearance, although you only see the back of his head and face through a reflection.

For whatever reason, there is nothing particularly noteworthy about William Hurt or Sigourney Weaver's work here (although it's the first time they've appeared in a film together since Eyewitness, 1981). Surprisingly, as is the case with the majority of the cast, they're just sort of hanging around the village.

This is my least favorite of Shyamalan's projects, but it's certainly his best looking picture. The cinematography is just gorgeous. The setting lends a creepy tone (the woods themselves reminded me of the vast, ominous surroundings in Blair Witch Project). Unfortunately, this is also Shyamalan's clumsiest film. There are sequences that don't flow well, and some of the moments that are meant to frighten the audience come across more silly than scary. I don't want to elaborate on these scenes, because it would only spoil a few of the major plot points.

Shyamalan's writing is sub par. Much of the dialogue is surprisingly goofy, but then I guess this is supposed to be in keeping with the nature of these isolated people. Also the film's core relationship is quite rushed, then again you could argue that these backward people go about alot of things quite differently than we do.

What's most odd about The Village is, it's really the first time that Shyamalan has more or less lied to the audience (to an extent, anyway). In The Sixth Sense, we got ghosts. In Unbreakable, we got a superhero. In Signs, we got aliens. In The Village, Shyamalan once again plays with our perception, but he doesn't exactly give the audience the payoff they showed up for

Certainly, the marketing campaign for this movie is misleading (but then so was Unbreakable's), and this was done, no doubt, to catch us off guard. The Village is (at it's heart) a story about the lengths one is willing to go in the name of love, and it's also about that perfect place--Utopia as it were. The mystical creatures in the woods are merely a device - Shyamalan uses to tell the real story, and it's a device he's used before. In the end, it is perfectly clear that the film maker is drawing inspiration from a post 9/11 world, and a big point he's trying to make is that there really is no perfect place. No matter where you live, bad things can always happen.

As I previously stated, at this point, everyone has come to expect a twist from Shyamalan's movies which means it becomes increasingly difficult for the film maker to top himself. For months now screenplay reviews and various theories have leaked on the internet, and despite the director's strongest efforts, secrecy has been very difficult to maintain.

I don't mind a good twist. Hell, Rod Serling made a career out this sort of thing with The Twilight Zone. And that's what The Village sort of reminded me of. An extended Twilight Zone episode. Of course, audiences are much more sophisticated these days, and the ending of this picture is sure to be met with all kinds of poking and prodding. It's flawed to be sure, (at one point, Shyamalan even tries to cover certain flaws by offering up a couple of half-assed explanations), but it's still interesting nevertheless. In some ways, it reminded me of a certain Peter Weir movie from a few years ago. In fact, if I were to hazard a guess, I'd say that Shyamalan is a fan of this particular director. Unbreakable certainly had hints of Weir's Fearless.

The Village is going to upset a lot of people, and no doubt, there will be plenty who deem it a major summer letdown. As I stated, it isn't particularly scary and rather than taking the film in a direction that most will probably hope for, Shyamalan takes it somewhere completely different.

Shyamalan tries hard to fool us and as a result, The Village is his most labored and self conscious effort. Still, it offers up some interesting twists and turns, and it sure is beautiful to look at. Just be warned. This is a human drama with only a few good scares. Check your expectations at the door or you're going to be sorely disappointed.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

YoManaLee

YoManaLee

Dis right here is a good movie. If you don't see it, me will cry. See "The Village" or them monsters in da woods will get you while you are sitting on the toilet.

John

John

Def. not what most expect. Most will dislike this movie.

Mr.Blonde

Mr.Blonde

I was really impressed with the first hour of the village. It was like M. Night had me in a tight grasp....I could wait to find out what was going on...then he craps all over me with the biggest cop out ending. Many things just defy pure logic. I hate this film so much just because I know how great it could have been. There were scenes that had me on the edge of my seat, until the M. Night staple twist happens. Then I didnt care anymore. Then at the end even another twist happens that I had guessed before hand as just a joke. Everyhting falls apart in the last half of this film and it is not worth the money it costs to go see it. M. Night needs to realize that he can get the same ideas across without shoving them down everyones throats, subtley is the key.

nirv117

nirv117

This was one of the most predictable movies I have ever seen, and as such was boring as hell. Most of the people in the Theater I was in agreed as boos came out at the end. I wish a creature would have come and killed me before It started before I was robbed of that time in my life.

Watching paint dry might be more fun.

Logan Tanner (spoiler alert)

Logan Tanner (spoiler alert)

I don't know if it's right to hold a director to his own standards, but Night really lost a lot of credibility in my eyes. First of all he's obviously lost sight of thd thing he does best and that's write good dialogue. The old-fashion way these charaters talk to each other makes sense at first, but after you find out the truth, then the fact that they talk like Puritans from another century is just ridiculous. Why Night? Second of all he lies to the audience. I'm sure he didn't have t otal contro lover the way they marketed this film - but at some point he could have stepped up and said, "hey The Village is not a horror film with monsters - knock it off."

Then even more unfogivable is the fact that after we learn that there are no monsters, Night throws in the scene where Bryce Howard is chased my a monster through the woods? A growling monster - what the hell was he thinking putting that scene in? I think Night really shoots himself and his loyal fans in the foot with The Village - don't get me wrong - I'm sure he'll go back to the drawing board and "write" another masterpiece and silence the naysayers that are literally coming out of the woods to attack his new film. But he needs to concentrate on the one thing that got him to the dance, and that's the terrific writing. There are so many metaphors that abound when analyzing this film but I'll just end on the most obvious and that's Night falls, but his day will come again and next time he'll be able to see the forrest for the trees.

LT

Hurt Everlasting

Hurt Everlasting

I think Shamalama ding dong should have thought twice before he cast William Hurt to play that part. He just recently played an almost Identical character in Tuck Everlasting which sadly and quite unfortunately is a better film than the latest form up-in-the Night Shamalama ding dong. I can't spell that thing. But I will admit that it would be cool to be named Night. Not all of the great lie that is The Village is Night's fault - but he should shoulder a good bit of the blame. He turned everyone that paid 8 bucks to see his film into Village Idiots.

Todd Gubler

Helen Judd

Helen Judd

The big mouse trap that M. Night Shyamalan set for himself with "The Sixth Sense" has finally sprung. Still even though The Village is most dour of his horror films and you can see the surprise ending coming for a country mile - I agree with Mr. Mast the film is still compelling. Mainly due to Shyamalan's skill with manipulating mood and his power of suggestion.

I think the bottom line is that what "The Village" says about human natue is more chilling than any clever plot twist or an alien trapped in the pantry.

Night Everlasting

Night Everlasting

Todd Gubler's point about William Hurt got me to thinking and the more I did the more I can't believe M. Night cast Hurt into this role. Not only is it exactly the same part he played in Tuck Everlasting - but if you look at it closely alot of the points about human nature, as well as the main premise of the story is total rip-off of Tuck. The parallels between the two stories are too numerous to list. Night has truly fallen when we can add the charges of plagiarism to the charges of lying and decieving the audience.

Tyler Blender

Tyler Blender

When your trademark is making movies built on third-act twists, you have to figure that someday that shaky house of cards is gonna come crashing down. That "The Village" falls apart before it ever really lays its foundation is the biggest surprise this tension-free movie has to offer. And really, how surprising is it, given that Shyamalan has so conditioned his audiences with his now-patented approach that the guesswork has become more interesting than anything his film has up it's sleeve. The one revelation that makes this film worth having made is Bryce Howard. And raises the quetion why Opie has kept this incredible creature under wraps for so long.

Wiseguy

Wiseguy

I don't think it will be long until there is a law in the Shyamalan household. The film The Village will be referred to as "The Film We Don't Speak Of."

Melanie Messner

Melanie Messner

Even if we let Night off the hook for lying to us about what his new film is really like, and accept it for what it purports to be, he still fails us. The idea of making a film about the way fear is used as mind control and limit freedoms is an interesting one and obviously timely in a post-9/11 world. The problem is that The Village only explores this concept in the most superficial way. And then falls on a half-assed "love conquers all" message instead of delving into the implications and complexities of the subject.

Adam

Adam

Hi everyone. So after having a little time to let The Village sink in, I have some more thoughts to share. Music guru Kyle England and I had a lengthy debate about the film recently. Actually, it wasn't really a debate, as we both had similar reactions to the movie, but he liked it a tad more than I did. He makes the keen observation that if this were Night's first picture, audiences would be creaming in their jeans just at the thought of the twists and turns in The Village. I don't know if I all together agree with that statement, but I certainly understand his point. There is a certain level of expectation that comes with a Shyamalan film due to the beautiful, unexpected twist revealed in The Sixth Sense. But in that particular picture, I felt for those characters. They were the driving force of the movie. The twist was just the icing on the cake, and there was no reason in the world to expect it. With The Village, the proceedings (at least where the twists are concerened) are a little more forced, and Night even tries to cover up the various flaws in the plot by offering up a couple of labored explanations towards the end of the film. It just seems that the twists in this movie are too thought out. They don't just happen, THEY HAPPEN!!!! And you know that old saying "Fool me once, shame on you--fool me twice, shame on me"? Well, get a load of the whole monster scenario in this movie. Night tries to pull the rug out from under us not once, but twice in the final twenty minutes. Obviously, I'm tap dancing here as I don't want to give away any of The Village's secrets, but I have to say, the twists in this movie (which are there to support what the film is really about--love, pain and loss)are clumsily executed, and are surprisingly predictable. Not because we come to expect them in a Shyamalan film, but because Night seems to have invested too much energy into them. Kyle thinks this is a better film than Signs (he hated the ending of the alien invasion/human drama), but as a whole, I was more moved by that picture because I cared about Mel Gibson and his plight (even if the loss of faith thing was a tad heavy handed). The Village offers up some good performances. Joaquin Phoenix is terrific, Bryce Dallas Howard is an absolute revelation, and I enjoyed Adrien Brody as The Village idiot, but many of the background characters are just that--BACKGROUND CHARACTERS. Their small amount of screen time results in a lack of depth. All of this having been said, I don't hate The Village. It's a visual stunner, features breathtaking cinematography, and is punctuated by a beautiful score by James Newtom Howard. I'm certainly not at all bothered that for the first time, Shyamalan has--in a sense--lied to the audience. This is a different kind of story, and the direction the movie takes makes sense given the world we're living in right now. It's obvious that like most of us, Shyamalan was shaken by 9/11, and in a way, this movie is his therapy. The bottom line is, The Village is flawed and inconsistent, but it's hardly a waste of time. As I stated in my review, just make sure you check your high expectations at the door. This may not be the film the trailer leads you to believe it is. Shyamalan remains an interesting storyteller, and thus far, Unbreakable is my favorite of his pictures. This is quite odd given that I couldn't stand that movie the first time I saw it. Now, I'm completely in love with it. I doubt that The Village will become stronger with repeated viewings, but it definitely has it's moments. One thing is certain. Even though The Village is receiving a fare share of backlash, this won't be the end of Shyamalan's career. This guy is far too talented, and he's got plenty of great stories left in him.

Sarah

Sarah

I feel that this movie was a little too random and coincidental. There was one part in particular that was incredibly difficult to buy. Not good. Boo. And I don't even like scary movies!

nobody

nobody

Although I have not seen it, I heard it's more of a love story with few scares. The trailers are extremely misleading I'm wondering if I should bother seeing it, even though I'm a big fan of Night's other films?

Stacey (spoiler alert)

Stacey (spoiler alert)

Hey, I seem to be one of the few people to really enjoyed this movie. Before I saw it I was determined to figure it out. I knew their had to be a twist and it simply wasn' t a monster movie. So I took what I already knew from previews. It seemed to take place in the past, the people looked like pilgrams, red is a bad color, things are in the woods that want to kill you and animals are skinned. I thought about it all night and I thought I had it. Indians!! Now don't laugh it actually makes really good sense. Wouldn't it be interesting if that was really what was in the woods. That would be a shocker. Although not a good one. Back to the actual movie the reason I enjoyed it was because after you find out that the monsters are'nt real you think that there will be no more thrills left in the movie but you're wrong. Another reason I liked it was because after the movie ended it made you think about the backstory.

Adam

Adam

Stacey,

Indians? Sweet! You might be on to something. Do I smell "The Village 2"? As for The Village, there were things I loved about it and things I didn't care much for. Still, I give Night props for pushing the boundaries. I mean seriously, I don't hear anyone debating about Van Helsing and Sleepover. Thanks for offering up the Spoier alert by the way.

Nobody,

I'd say The Village is worth a look. I just like to let people know that this isn't the monster movie the trailer suggests it is, but more of a human drama (and love story) with a couple of labored twists. Still, I liked The Village. Not as much as Night's other films, mind you, but it's still worth seeing.

Night Stalker

Night Stalker

If a man has directed several great films, it's only a matter of time before someone gives him a whole bunch of money to make a really bad one. And "The Village", the latest film from M. Night Shyamalan, is bad. Really bad. Laugh-out-loud bad. Sure, it looks great, but the extraordinary command that Shymalan has over his images this time out is attached to a story that would barely pass muster on "Night Gallery". I fear the problem may be with Shyamalan himself. Looking at how this might have happened, I can see one of two scenarios: Either nobody wanted to upset Shymalan by informing him that his characters, his dialogue and in fact his whole concept sucked green weenies... or someone did bring it up and he wasn't listening.

shar

shar

I'd give The Village thumbs down it was the worst movie I've seen in a long time, not a horror movie at all.

al

al

This is the way they did movies before they had the ability to do real special effects. Not neat techiques just cheap.

Curious

Curious

I have a question to only people who saw the village, first of all what is up with the rangers last name being walker just like the blind girl, second what was the whole point of the picture locked in the box and last the little boy dieing in the begging of the movie? Thanks alot.

To Curious

To Curious

OK - I think you should really see this movie again...but here ya go...

The Ranger's last isn't Walker -the reserve is named Walker (that's why its on his jacket) because the girl's father (remember - his dad was a multi-millionaire) bought the woods and set it up as a nature reserve so that no one would discover the village (as the park warden ...M.Night's camio character... explains when the ranger comes in for medicine)...

The point of the picture was the convey to the audience that it was 1970 when the elders went to the village (the elders are the ones in the picture, approx 30 years before this all happens), and the entire "1890" thing is a fake, just like the monsters - this movie takes place in the present time - most of the people in the village just don't know it.

The boy dying in the beginning of the movie...if you recall...was also a hint...he died of ILLNESS...they say that later...

you really, really, have to WATCH these movies close if you're gonna get the twist ending! Check it out again - I think it'll make more sense now!

Brian Porter

Brian Porter

Nevermind the flimsy retarded ending or the flattest acting outside of the new Star Wars movies. The worst part of this movie was that I counted 18 microphones visible in this movie. Not just a little visible either, but completely in frame. Nothing blows the 1890s motif out of the water quite like a big furry mic threatening to hit someone in the head. This is the worst movie I have ever paid to see. It looked like a class prjoect for 5th graders. How can any movie be released with 18 mics in frame. Apparaently all the money in this movie was spent on actors, leaving M. Night about $40 to shoot the thing and editing was never considered. Ed Wood proabably never saw 18 mics in his whole career, but if he would have he would have kept them out of view in the final edit. Night Time is over.

Trivial Pursuit

Trivial Pursuit

My question is a rather trivial one about the movie...did it ever say what Joaquin Phoenix's "color" was? They kinda made a big deal over it and if it was ever mentioned, I missed it. Someone help me out.

Big Spoiler, good question?

Big Spoiler, good question?

DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU ARE PLANNING ON SEEING THIS MOVIE! Did anybody notice that there seem to be a timeline problem in this movie? Looking at the picture that they are holding at the end, that shows all of the elders before they get to the village, it appears to be in the 1980s...so that would mean that the original elders went to the village about 25 years ago....which would be consistant with the age of Joaquin Phoenix's character... but WHERE DID ALL THOSE OTHER PEOPLE COME FROM? There seem to be an awful lot of them... and we have to assume that they were all born there except the original elders (maybe 7 or 10 people)...because they don't know the secret...but how is that possible? Joaquin Phoenix would have to be oldest one there...since he was the only baby that they brought (at least in the pic).... Even if there is a whole lot of swinging and inbreeding (yuck!) going on in this Village - its still impossible to have anybody inbetween Joaquin Phoenix and the elders... becuase they couldn't have been born there... Is this a real problem? Or what am I missing here? Thoughts??? (I still really liked this movie - enjoyed it from start to end!)

Good Night Suit

Good Night Suit

According to Reuters the Simon & Schuster publishing house is prepping for a likely lawsuit against Shyamalan and Disney, accusing the director of stealing the basic story for The Village from the children's novel Running Out Of Time by Margaret Peterson Haddix. In the novel children are raised in what they believe is a 19th century town until an epidemic strikes and one of them has to strike out through the surrounding woods to get medicine. Yeah, I can see why they think Shyamalan may have borrowed a bit ... Now we know why some of the scenes in this film are so damned childish!

Betty Warnick

Adam

Adam

Good Night Suit,

I read about that lawsuit. Funny that the lawyers didn't make a move until after the film had a $55 million opening weekend. Had it tanked, no suit would have been filed. A similar suit was filed against Night after Signs came out. Could all of this be a big hoax? You never can tell when it comes to Night.

Big Spoiler,

You have pointed out yet another flaw, one that Night isn't interested in answering, and one that he would probably be quick to point out doesn't matter because it doesn't have anything to do with what the movie is really about. It's just another device put in the film to fool us when the big twist is revealed. As I pointed out in an earlier message board post, this is Night's most labored and flawed picture, but it isn't without it's charms.

Hank Sanford

Hank Sanford

Almost like it is in real life...

... and if you haven't seen the film yet, you'll know what I mean whenever you do.

The Village is the story of a small village, duh, with the frightening knowledge of blah, blah, blah. We all know the story. The thing is, "Not everything is as it seems."

This is true, looks can be decieving, especially with M. Night Shyamalan's latest. Now might be the time to stop before I give away to much... oops.

One thing you're probably interested in though: is it scary? Well, my answer is: yes. Very scary. And no, it's not the creatures themselves that are scary. It's the fact that this kind of thing could be going on with us in our own lives. With our OWN authority. After seeing this film, it really made me wonder: Is THIS how it really is?

The story: A very creative and original idea, in my mind. The three "twists" were very shocking, even if you already know everything about the movie.

Acting: superb. Newcomer Bryce Dallas Howard steals the show. She's absolutley incredible. Her acting covers up many silly lines and dialouge throughout the film. Adrian Brody is now one of my new favorite actors after seeing him in this particular film. He's great. Joaquin Pheonix, can't complain. Always does a good job. And of course, William Hurt gives a nice, warm feel to his character, looking truely like a pleasent father-figure.

Direction: Ehh... so so. One thing I really enjoyed though, is how Night chose to reveal the creatures very early on in the film. It gives audiences something to be scared about.

Visuals: Roger Deakins did an incredible job with the look of this film. The "oranges" really seem to stick out in the many, many night scenes. The town it self in one word: beautiful. The creatures themselves have a very eerie look to them. You'll know when you see the film.

Many people disagree with the whole twist ending of this film. I thought it was genius. Whether you're a Shyamalan fan or not, I reccomend giving this film a try.

Cara

Cara

Not a bad movie, just not a good one. The plot was good if not predictable, (I spoilt it for the whole cinema by shouting out the big twist in the excitement of finally guessing the ending of a film!) However I can only remember two twists, not three as most of you have stated, I'll have to read up on spoilers I think! Anyone who hasn't seen the movie yet, look out for it, it's worth watching if not to just see if you can guess the ending, because if I can then you have no excuse!

Martin the Martian

Martin the Martian

The Village is an effective film, as long as they stayed in the village - the thrills and chills and twists that Shamalama Ding Dong has cooked up in the woods could have been concieved and filmed by 12 year olds. A major let down. Good M Nightshirt!

Opie's Daughter

Opie's Daughter

The Village made me appreciate one thing - Redheads. I want to jump on Opie's daughter and never jump off - Lordy-O

Buff

Buff

The Village is not only the worst move to come out of the mind of Shamalama Dingdong, but one of the most absurd attempt to frighten in recent memory. Let me recount a few of the ways. How about the scene where William Hurt leads Ron Howard's daughter into the shed and cautions her to do her very best not to scream. First of all, the girl is BLIND. And should she had been blessed with the gift of sight he should have cautioned her not to laugh. What he reveals to the blind girl and the rest of us who could plainly see is porcupine suit. Is it just me or is a porcupine suit the most horrifying image M Night could dream up? Please? How about the scene in which we are asked to believe that a blind girl could contrive to trick a sighted man in a costume into falling into a huge hole? I dould go on, but I really can't believe that people are buying into this garbage, nor can I belive you gave the film a B-

Tom Perkins

Tom Perkins

I am usually one for one on Mr. Adams' reviews however, this movie is one of the three worst movies I have seen in years (competeing with the remake of Stepford Wives, White Chicks, and Jason Comes to Jesus Part 52). Lord, it was painstakingly slow and about as gripping as teflon. The plot was blan but the acting decent, considering what they had to work with. I can't imagine the budget was much over the cost of acting and labor - four houses, one tree shak, and lots of woods, seen mostly from afar. And the famous surprise twist at the end...oh, please.

Am I getting too picky or has the great majority of movies made in the past two year been mostly thin soup?

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!